Big Question - Who We Are?
At some stage in our lives, everybody asks the big questions: “Who made us,” and “the reason we here?”So that who did create us? Many of us have been brought up more about science than religion, and to believe in the big-bang and evolution more than God. However which makes more sense? And is there any good reason why the theories of science and creationism cannot coexist?
Important Questions
The Big Bang may give an explanation for origin of the universe, but it does not explain the origin of the fundamental dust cloud. This dust cloud (which, in accordance with the theory, drew together, compressed and then exploded) had to are derived from somewhere. After all, it consisted of enough matter to form not only our galaxy, but the billion other galaxies within the known universe. Just where did that come form? Who, or what, created the primordial dust cloud?In the same way, evolution may explain the fossil record, however it falls far short of explaining the perfect essence of human life—the soul. All of us have one. We feel its presence, we speak of its existence and at times pray for the salvation. But precisely the religious can explain where it originated from. The theory of natural selection can clarify many of the material components of living things, but it fails to describe the human soul.
The theory that the universe exploded and next developed in balanced perfection through random events and natural selection is little distinct from the proposal that, by dropping bombs into a junkyard, eventually one of them will blow everything together into a perfect Mercedes.
Still another argument to dismiss the concept of Creationism concentrates upon what people perceive to-be the imperfections of creation. These are the basic “Just how can there be a God if such-and-such happened?” arguments. The issue under conversation could be anything coming from a natural disaster to birth defects, from destruction to grandma’s cancer. That’s not the idea. The point is that refusing God based upon what we comprehend to be injustices of life thinks that a divine being would not provide designed our lives to be anything other than perfect, and could have established justice on the planet.
Hmm … is there hardly any other option?
We can simply as easily suggest that God did not design life on Earth to be haven, but rather an examination, the punishment or rewards of which are to be had in the next life, and that is where God establishes His ultimate justice. Supporting this concept we can well ask who experienced more injustices in their worldly lives than God’s preferred, which is to say the prophets? And which do we be prepared to occupy the highest stations in paradise, if not those who keep true faith in the face of worldly adversity? So suffering in this worldly life doesn't necessarily result in God’s disfavor, and a blissful worldly life doesn't necessarily translate into blessedness in the afterlife.I would personally hope that, by this line of reasoning, we can agree upon the response to the first “big question.” Who made us? Can we agree that if we are creation, God is the Creator?
If we cannot agree on this point, there most likely is not much point in continuing. Nevertheless, for those who do agree, let’s proceed to “big question” number two—why are we here? What, in other words, is the objective of life?
EmoticonEmoticon